🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.