🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to reinitiate nuclear negotiations with the United States on condition that it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has announced.

Abbas Araghchi said only diplomacy worked, and shared recent overtures had come from intermediaries to resume talks with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Tehran was not yet able to allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit struck enrichment centers for safety concerns.

Navigating a Challenging Path

Araghchi is walking a difficult path since Iran does not want be seen to be acting from a situation of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged stronger in military terms and mentally from the joint assault on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to enrich uranium domestically that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the impasse in the prior discussions.

Prior Talks Suddenly Concluded

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that culminated with Donald Trump claiming the locations had been obliterated. Subsequently, European countries used their authority to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an local partnership with American involvement could process nuclear material. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the talks that US nuclear scientists could function inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Representatives asserted repeatedly they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Present Situation

Iranian officials stated the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the offer could be resurrected in certain ways if talks resume.

The US president in recent days stated he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but privately Tehran representatives claim they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from America either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the wake of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran states diplomacy is not part of a show.

Negotiating Position

In his speech to the gathering, intended to depict the US as a controlling nation that abuses the concept of global regulations, the foreign minister said the fortnight-long engagement showed the conflict could not be settled by armed force. He asserted the strikes started with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with complete American awareness and coordination, making trust difficult to reestablish.

Dialogue Continues the Primary Solution

The foreign minister stated: "It was not Iran that had deserted diplomacy; it was America and the Western nations that had always tried to enforce their demands during the talks. Dialogue can still be alive and remains the final solution to settle disagreements, but its criteria, regulations and principles must be followed."

"Provided that they address to the nation of Iran with the approach of dignity and respect, they will get a reply in the equivalent language."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the struggle of recovery and rebuilding, Araghchi stated he was confident Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We gained multiple understandings from this conflict; we have identified our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He added: "We successfully passed this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to obliterate, stays intact. The sites and equipment, if damaged, will be restored; what is important is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but failed to destroy. The nation of Iran have become more resilient, more cohesive, and more supportive of the government and the state in the aftermath of this assault."